Skip to content

Conversation

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

Fixes #4796

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Sep 25, 2021

This looks reasonable, but I would welcome a quick Core cross-check, given the ever-increasing complexity of decl-specifiers.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe added the cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG. label Sep 25, 2021
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Nov 12, 2023

CWG meeting consensus Nov 11: This is an improvement. We acknowledge that this wording strategy comes with a maintenance burden, but it's better than the status quo.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe removed the cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG. label Nov 12, 2023
@tkoeppe tkoeppe self-assigned this Nov 12, 2023
@tkoeppe tkoeppe added the after-motions Pull request is to be applied after the pending edits from WG21 straw polls have been applied. label Nov 12, 2023
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

@tkoeppe, what are we waiting for with this fix?

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Sep 26, 2024

I think it's fine to go, thanks!

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 4930897 into cplusplus:main Sep 26, 2024
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the c41 branch September 26, 2024 09:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

after-motions Pull request is to be applied after the pending edits from WG21 straw polls have been applied.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[dcl.spec.general] p2 prevents the valid type combination

2 participants